Jump to content


Photo
bugs

STEP v2.10.0 Official Bug Reports



  • Please log in to reply
137 replies to this topic

#16 EssArrBee

EssArrBee

    Incompatibilism Manager

  • STEP Staff
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 7,721 posts

Posted 13 June 2017 - 12:38 AM

We may need to make a note that the stable version of Wrye Bash is used, version 306. The beta has added stuff in for Graphics and Cell records that cause issues without proper tagging. Keeping the beta version means we would have to have users run the tagging script on mods. It's a long and annoying process. 

 

I hope to do away with it soon when I figure out Mator Smash better. I hope to have it done within two weeks. I'm pretty much part-time this summer, so I have lots of time re-learn everything I've forgotten in the last year.  :bleh:



#17 Hawk

Hawk

    Prisoner

  • Members
  • 17 posts

Posted 13 June 2017 - 01:41 AM

Refresh your cache. :thumbsup:

I did. And it is still there. Sorry, maybe I haven't made myself clear enough - I was talking about STEP:2.2.9.2.

This:

ajdyW8l.jpg

 

EDIT:

Now that I see Changelog/2.2.9.2, there is something like "Implemented since the 2.10.0 release" I believe instead of "2.2.9.2", this could lead to confusion. I know this should be in the other thread, but I am writin it together here... It is surely related to the version change.

 

EDIT2:

Now I see this issue is also on later changelogs, 2.2.9.1 & 2.2.9 & 2.2.8 & 2.2.7. They refer to the current guide, not their respective.


Edited by Hawk, 13 June 2017 - 01:53 AM.

  • 0

#18 Randomusername1212

Randomusername1212

    Prisoner

  • Members
  • 2 posts

Posted 13 June 2017 - 06:12 AM

Created an account just to report this and look for a solution; when installing the new step compilation patch it says I am not eligible for even the CORE installation when in reality I am. I even double checked within the XML dependency flags to make sure I had all plugins it asked for active and installed, and I did. Even more odd is I went back and attempted to reinstall the step compilation patch for version 2.2.9.2 just to test it out and see if that installation would allow me to install the patches, and it did, both the CORE and Extended.

 

This is my first time making a bug report like this and I have no clue what other information you would require or how I would go about getting it, so if you do need more information just let me know what you need and how to acquire it.


  • 0

#19 Shadriss

Shadriss

    Jarl

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 685 posts

Posted 13 June 2017 - 07:51 AM

You'll be surprised how often that WORKS, though. (signed by a Hospital Electronic Biomed Tech)

Oh I know it works a lot... which makes it no less funny how often nobody tries this until they are told to.

 

@ Hawk:

 

In addition to the main changelog for a given version, there were (previously) changes that were made AFTER their release, which is what those tags refer to. IE, if a mod was changed or altered from the writeup it had when the main guide was released, it ended up being noted there so you knew it had been changed AFTER the original version of the guide. It is a bit confusing, but as I understand it with the new versioning system that's being implemented, that kind of confusion will be going away anyhow.


Edited by Shadriss, 13 June 2017 - 07:55 AM.

  • 0

#20 TechAngel85

TechAngel85

    Akatosh

  • Administrators
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 11,938 posts

Posted 13 June 2017 - 08:48 AM

I did. And it is still there. Sorry, maybe I haven't made myself clear enough - I was talking about STEP:2.2.9.2.

This:

ajdyW8l.jpg

 

EDIT:

Now that I see Changelog/2.2.9.2, there is something like "Implemented since the 2.10.0 release" I believe instead of "2.2.9.2", this could lead to confusion. I know this should be in the other thread, but I am writin it together here... It is surely related to the version change.

 

EDIT2:

Now I see this issue is also on later changelogs, 2.2.9.1 & 2.2.9 & 2.2.8 & 2.2.7. They refer to the current guide, not their respective.

Ah, the extra link. I see what you was talking about now. I was looking for an unrendered paragraph tag. Took care of the extra link.

 

As for the changelog, Shadriss is correct. There will not be an "Implemented since the 2.10.0 release" due to changes in the version control. Seems we just forgot to update the template which controls that notification. I will look into it later since it can be a bit confusing.



#21 TechAngel85

TechAngel85

    Akatosh

  • Administrators
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 11,938 posts

Posted 13 June 2017 - 08:54 AM

Created an account just to report this and look for a solution; when installing the new step compilation patch it says I am not eligible for even the CORE installation when in reality I am. I even double checked within the XML dependency flags to make sure I had all plugins it asked for active and installed, and I did. Even more odd is I went back and attempted to reinstall the step compilation patch for version 2.2.9.2 just to test it out and see if that installation would allow me to install the patches, and it did, both the CORE and Extended.

 

This is my first time making a bug report like this and I have no clue what other information you would require or how I would go about getting it, so if you do need more information just let me know what you need and how to acquire it.

The only change made to the installer was the added requirement of "Vividian - Extended Weathers.esp" from Vivid Clouds and Fogs.



#22 Randomusername1212

Randomusername1212

    Prisoner

  • Members
  • 2 posts

Posted 13 June 2017 - 11:21 AM

The only change made to the installer was the added requirement of "Vividian - Extended Weathers.esp" from Vivid Clouds and Fogs.

Oh my god I feel such an idiot. I double checked even TRIPLE checked to ensure all my plugins were the correct names as I had this issue before already when installing the previous STEP patch yet I still missed the fact that my vivid weathers ESP was appended with NLA because the name got cut off of the plugin list for being too long. Thanks for the quick response and sorry for my idiotic question.


  • 0

#23 Shadriss

Shadriss

    Jarl

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 685 posts

Posted 13 June 2017 - 11:26 AM

Not an idiotic question - no such thing.

 

However, some questions do come with push-ups attached. Drop and gimmie 10. :)


  • 1

#24 EssArrBee

EssArrBee

    Incompatibilism Manager

  • STEP Staff
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 7,721 posts

Posted 13 June 2017 - 12:06 PM

Oh my god I feel such an idiot. I double checked even TRIPLE checked to ensure all my plugins were the correct names as I had this issue before already when installing the previous STEP patch yet I still missed the fact that my vivid weathers ESP was appended with NLA because the name got cut off of the plugin list for being too long. Thanks for the quick response and sorry for my idiotic question.

Use the changelog linked at the top of the guide wiki page that lists all the new mods and removed mods.



#25 Mercury71

Mercury71

    Prisoner

  • Members
  • 5 posts

Posted 13 June 2017 - 04:13 PM

Started a new game after followinging STEP and crashed after a few minutes in Helgen. Now i crasch directly when loading. Get the message down below in MO:

 

23:05:29 [W] QSslSocket: cannot resolve TLSv1_2_client_method

23:05:29 [W] QSslSocket: cannot resolve TLSv1_1_server_method
23:05:29 [W] QSslSocket: cannot resolve TLSv1_2_server_method
23:05:29 [W] QSslSocket: cannot resolve SSL_select_next_proto
23:05:29 [W] QSslSocket: cannot resolve SSL_CTX_set_next_proto_select_cb
23:05:29 [W] QSslSocket: cannot resolve SSL_get0_next_proto_negotiated
23:05:30 [D] ssl support: 1
 
Have searched but not find a good solution. Any ideas?

  • 0

#26 Nebulous112

Nebulous112

    High King

  • Super Moderators
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,414 posts

Posted 13 June 2017 - 05:18 PM

Try installing Win32 OpenSSL v1.1.0f Light from here: https://slproweb.com...n32OpenSSL.html

Another program may be interfering with the SSL from MO, and this should fix it. Not sure if that would cause crashes, though.

#27 juddbal

juddbal

    Prisoner

  • Members
  • 2 posts

Posted 13 June 2017 - 11:25 PM

Just wanted to drop a note.  The instructions page for SRO may benefit from a comment about the 5-part download and installation.

 

Thanks for the all the work!


  • 0

#28 Mercury71

Mercury71

    Prisoner

  • Members
  • 5 posts

Posted 13 June 2017 - 11:50 PM

Try installing Win32 OpenSSL v1.1.0f Light from here: https://slproweb.com...n32OpenSSL.html

Another program may be interfering with the SSL from MO, and this should fix it. Not sure if that would cause crashes, though.

I found this last night and installed the 64bit version (i am on Windows 10). But it seem to be over my expetice to get it to work. :(


  • 0

#29 Nebulous112

Nebulous112

    High King

  • Super Moderators
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,414 posts

Posted 13 June 2017 - 11:59 PM

You need the 32 bit version. Should just need to run the installer from what I remember. 64 bit version won't help with MO, which is a 32-bit program.

Edit: If you need help installing it send me a PM. I'll download it again myself and figure it out for you if it is tricky.

#30 Mercury71

Mercury71

    Prisoner

  • Members
  • 5 posts

Posted 14 June 2017 - 12:33 AM

You need the 32 bit version. Should just need to run the installer from what I remember. 64 bit version won't help with MO, which is a 32-bit program.

Edit: If you need help installing it send me a PM. I'll download it again myself and figure it out for you if it is tricky.

I did install the 32 bit version at first just because i figured MO is 32 bit. I just ran the installer (found a youtube video and in there it was just a default installation). So i have both installed... maby that is the problem now. Will uninstall 64 bit when i get home from work.

Still MO gives me same massages. I run the latest version of MO and as an admin.


  • 0



Also tagged with one or more of these keywords: bugs

0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users