Jump to content


Photo
accepted

Complete Crafting Overhaul Remade (by kryptopyr)

mod

  • Please log in to reply
278 replies to this topic

#271 Shadriss

Shadriss

    Jarl

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 685 posts

Posted 27 November 2015 - 12:26 PM

Krypt - just started with the 1.7, and I like the way that mods are being handled, but at the same time there seems to be some inconsistency. I use both Bandoleer and CoS. I originally had the esps for both enabled (forgot to turn off Bando), and both mods were greyed out/unavailable in the menu. Turned off Bando, they came available. Turned off CoS... no change. What exactly is CCOR looking for in the CoS case to make it avail in the mod activation portion?


  • 0

#272 GrantSP

GrantSP

    The antipodean

  • Super Moderators
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,909 posts

Posted 18 January 2016 - 06:57 PM

Another minor change in the STEP guide for this mod. Since we are recommending the WAF patch to be installed it might be an idea to just explicitly state to merge this when installing, as that is the most logical option to do. Of course it is possible to make a new mod in MO's left pane, but for new users this seems overly 'creative'.



#273 TechAngel85

TechAngel85

    Akatosh

  • Administrators
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 11,978 posts

Posted 18 January 2016 - 10:49 PM

We leave that choice up to the user whether or not they want to merge. If they for some reason want a profile without WAF, it's much simpler to just untick the patch rather than having to hide assets, move plugins in or out of Optional ESPs, etc, etc. With that said, I merge all the mod's addons, optionals, and patches (besides Content Addon) because I wouldn't play without WAF or most of the STEP mods with any setup. But there are plenty of users that would play without them (Pack users for example) and would want to keep the patches and addons separate.



#274 Shadriss

Shadriss

    Jarl

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 685 posts

Posted 13 February 2016 - 07:35 PM

Krypt - just started with the 1.7, and I like the way that mods are being handled, but at the same time there seems to be some inconsistency. I use both Bandoleer and CoS. I originally had the esps for both enabled (forgot to turn off Bando), and both mods were greyed out/unavailable in the menu. Turned off Bando, they came available. Turned off CoS... no change. What exactly is CCOR looking for in the CoS case to make it avail in the mod activation portion?

I still have this issue. Does anyone have any ideas or suggestions on it's resolution?


  • 1

#275 boycad

boycad

    Prisoner

  • Members
  • 37 posts

Posted 04 March 2016 - 06:24 AM

Krypt - just started with the 1.7, and I like the way that mods are being handled, but at the same time there seems to be some inconsistency. I use both Bandoleer and CoS. I originally had the esps for both enabled (forgot to turn off Bando), and both mods were greyed out/unavailable in the menu. Turned off Bando, they came available. Turned off CoS... no change. What exactly is CCOR looking for in the CoS case to make it avail in the mod activation portion?

More questions on this... Im a slow tester.  Apparently 1.7 replaces or obivates *all* (!!??) the .esp's from 'Cloaks of Skyrim', WiC, and Bandoliers.  These mods should probably be installed first, or perhaps simply a lower priority will be sufficient, to allow the CCOR 1.7 package to dependably assume the function of these .esps (presumably through the MCM. (thats actually sort of question).

 

Can I still stop Imperials from (mostly) having cloaks? 

 

see Smile44's guide along these lines http://wiki.step-pro...m/Pack:Survival


Edited by boycad, 04 March 2016 - 06:37 AM.

  • 0

#276 BUBISHI

BUBISHI

    Commander

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 246 posts

Posted 04 March 2016 - 07:35 AM

I have only CoS in use with CCOR and disabled the CoS.eps in MO. Kept all other files. Then activated the CoS option in CCORs MCM menue and everything works fine.

Guess its the same procedure with the other .esp.

As the .esp are not activated load order does not matter, but to be sure I would sort CoS/WiC and Bandoliers above CCOR in MO left pane so it can overwrite the files from those mods. But not sure about that.


Edited by BUBISHI, 04 March 2016 - 07:37 AM.

  • 0

#277 DoubleYou

DoubleYou

    Wiki Stepper

  • Super Moderators
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 4,468 posts

Posted 04 March 2016 - 10:00 AM

Priority should not matter. I use Cloaks of Skyrim in this way too, and it works admirably so far. I do not know if you can do the customization you desire, however.



#278 Shadriss

Shadriss

    Jarl

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 685 posts

Posted 04 March 2016 - 10:36 AM

Ahhhhh, somehow I missed that CoS was put into the same category type as Bandolier and such. Thought I still needed the esp active from CoS to use it. Thanks for this - I honestly should have thought of trying this.


  • 0

#279 boothemjr

boothemjr

    Prisoner

  • Members
  • 1 posts

Posted 29 August 2017 - 07:37 PM

Another minor change in the STEP guide for this mod. Since we are recommending the WAF patch to be installed it might be an idea to just explicitly state to merge this when installing, as that is the most logical option to do. Of course it is possible to make a new mod in MO's left pane, but for new users this seems overly 'creative'.

As a newbie working through S.T.E.P. for the first time, this comment actually fixed my problem. If that could be updated, I feel that may save some future newbies the headache.


  • 0



Also tagged with one or more of these keywords: accepted, mod

0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users