Jump to content


Photo
accepted

Skyrim Realistic Overhaul (by Starac)

mod

  • Please log in to reply
416 replies to this topic

#406 kabepo

kabepo

    Citizen

  • Contributors
  • Pip
  • 88 posts

Posted 08 July 2018 - 09:12 PM

I was bored and then decided to improve some textures  ::):  Majority are new, and mostly 4k. 

Should we use the 1.8 updates instead of the 1.7 updates, or should we load 1.7 updates and then the 1.8 updates?


  • 0

#407 Joat_Mon

Joat_Mon

    Guard

  • Guests
  • PipPip
  • 194 posts

Posted 08 July 2018 - 09:33 PM

I already had the 1.7 files downloaded and assembled so I used the 1.8 updater and let it overwrite. I you have not downloaded 1.7 yet and you want to use 1.8 just download the 1.8 files and not the 1.8 updater.


  • 0

#408 onem4nb4nd

onem4nb4nd

    Citizen

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 61 posts

Posted 09 July 2018 - 04:02 AM


I already had the 1.7 files downloaded and assembled so I used the 1.8 updater and let it overwrite. I you have not downloaded 1.7 yet and you want to use 1.8 just download the 1.8 files and not the 1.8 updater.

Actually, you need everything for Oldrim (as discussed on pg22 of this thread). It appears the two 1.8 versions are both part of the update. It's just divided because some textures are incompatible with SSE. The updates with "Original Skyrim" in the name refer to Oldrim (not an original update or w/e) and shouldn't be used with SSE, the versions that don't say Original Skyrim should be used with both SSE and Oldrim. I think the install order is a minor concern but I'd guess you treat the Original Skyrim version as a bonus and add it on top of the base update.
I briefly get confused and have to work it out every time I visit that page but I always come to this conclusion.


  • 0

#409 Starac

Starac

    Guard

  • Mod Authors
  • PipPip
  • 159 posts

Posted 09 July 2018 - 04:50 AM

Why would i create 2 updates? 

No you don't need 1.7 update. Actually i have wiped out these 2 old updates today. 

 

And yes for Oldrim you need everything, and Oldrim update must be installed on top. 


  • 0

#410 Kossu

Kossu

    Prisoner

  • Members
  • 9 posts

Posted 09 July 2018 - 08:31 PM

Hmm I think I found some seam issues near Riverwood on the way to bleak falls barrow (SSE): 

 

https://imgur.com/a/JQvNkDJ

 

Sorry if this has been mentioned allready. ( SRO is being overwritten by SMIM only but that doesnt touch landscape textures )

 

Still thanks for the great texture pack!


Edited by Kossu, 09 July 2018 - 08:33 PM.

  • 1

#411 Starac

Starac

    Guard

  • Mod Authors
  • PipPip
  • 159 posts

Posted 10 July 2018 - 08:34 AM

We have talked about this before. There are some places where these seams can be found, in vanilla game too. 

 

But your problem is different. Here is the same place and i don't have seams.

 

3wykveb.png


  • 0

#412 Kossu

Kossu

    Prisoner

  • Members
  • 9 posts

Posted 10 July 2018 - 10:59 AM

We have talked about this before. There are some places where these seams can be found, in vanilla game too. 

 

But your problem is different. Here is the same place and i don't have seams.

 

I redownloaded the files added the new 1.8 sse update and just made a new mod organizer setup with only SRO landscapes. Im getting quite different look then your shot :S my textures have some dark smears ( couldnt find better word for them? maybe depth smears). But you were right its much more apparent in vanilla.

 

https://imgur.com/a/pPZ7JQn

 

First is SRO second Vanilla and Last I took with Osmodius landscapes. Its those black smear ( that are especially visible in vanilla ) causing the difference.

 

What on earth is causing them(Since I dont have anything else then SRO in MO now ) or did I miss something in the installation process? P1-3 and sse specific update on top.


  • 0

#413 Starac

Starac

    Guard

  • Mod Authors
  • PipPip
  • 159 posts

Posted 10 July 2018 - 03:07 PM

There's no need to redownload my textures cause this isn't a texture problem. To remove these dark smears you must disable snow shader.

In fact in my SRO readme file i have recommended snow shader to be disabled. It really destroys textures, especially snow textures. And for some unknown reason it's applied not only on snow textures? As usual sloppy Bethesda job.   

 

Here is with/without:

 

UUnAIRc.png


Edited by Starac, 10 July 2018 - 03:10 PM.

  • 2

#414 Kossu

Kossu

    Prisoner

  • Members
  • 9 posts

Posted 10 July 2018 - 03:45 PM

There's no need to redownload my textures cause this isn't a texture problem. To remove these dark smears you must disable snow shader.

In fact in my SRO readme file i have recommended snow shader to be disabled. It really destroys textures, especially snow textures. And for some unknown reason it's applied not only on snow textures? As usual sloppy Bethesda job.   

 

 

*Facepalm*

 

Thank you so much. I could have not deduced it to snow shader from that.

 

Oh classic Todd and being naughty..

 

Keep up the good work and have a nice week!


Edited by Kossu, 10 July 2018 - 03:46 PM.

  • 0

#415 STEPSS

STEPSS

    Prisoner

  • Members
  • 2 posts

Posted 19 September 2018 - 02:22 PM

If I wanted to consolidate files, I go by file tree right?
 
ie Part 2 textures-architecture-windhelm goes into Part 1 textures-architecture
 
Is there any reason that's a bad thing to do?

  • 0

#416 TechAngel85

TechAngel85

    Akatosh

  • Administrators
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 12,514 posts

Posted 20 September 2018 - 09:27 AM

If I wanted to consolidate files, I go by file tree right?

ie Part 2 textures-architecture-windhelm goes into Part 1 textures-architecture

Is there any reason that's a bad thing to do?

That's fine to do. I merge the files when installing in MO.

#417 STEPSS

STEPSS

    Prisoner

  • Members
  • 2 posts

Posted 20 September 2018 - 10:19 PM

Thanks!


  • 0



Also tagged with one or more of these keywords: accepted, mod

0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users