Jump to content

High Quality LODs (by Ethatron)


stoppingby4now

Recommended Posts

No snow seams for you in SR without the textures? These were taken outside of Windhelm.

 

I'll check them out tonight, my phone dies trying to view images in threads. I did most of my normals testing in whiterun area where there was good improvement. If snow is the real problem the better course might be to delete just those.

 

I've been playing in Dawnstar lately and haven't noticed seams tho...its quite snowy there.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 58
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Current SR:LE is HQLOD meshes' date=' normals + EDT2 textures. The normals do add a lot in some areas. Never had any issue with this.[/quote']

Indeed. I agree ... guess I forgot that HQ LOD included the normals :whistling:

 

I think a minor seam here and there is worth it. In the meantime, we should let Sparrow know so he has an opportunity to remap the few offending textures onto the revised meshes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm home! So I'll fly around some areas and see if this happens everyone or if I just found a lucky spot. I still don't advocate the normal though because the the obvious color difference. It's at least obvious to me, but we'll see what some more testing reveals. It might simply come down to using a set of textures (like just using the snow textures from HQLODs and leaving the rest as EDT2).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I did find some texture seams area Dawnstar and other ares; however, they are mostly hidden by the terrain in these areas. I did grab a full set of compares to show one seam that didn't disappear with the additional textures like the previous one did in my other compare. I'll let you all be the judge of what combination looks the best.

 

EDT2 Only  >>  MedRes Meshes  >>  HighRes Meshes  >>  MedRes+Normals  >>  HighRes+Normals

Posted Image Posted Image Posted Image Posted Image Posted Image

 

MedRes+Textures  >>  HighRes+Textures  >>  MedRes+Normals+Textures  >>  HighRes+Normals+Textures

Posted Image Posted Image Posted Image Posted Image

 

 

Now I also wanted to do a compare the what is being recommended and it's affect in snowy areas. Lets take a look:

 

EDT2 Only  >>  High Res Meshes  >>  High Res+Normals  >>  High Res+Textures

Posted Image Posted Image Posted Image Posted Image

As you can see, with the normals in snowy areas the LODs are brighter than those of the non-LOD textures. This isn't ideal. You will also notice some odd things happening in areas with the normals when it comes to snow. The best is the second images with only the Meshes installed. I would say that if the normals are going to be recommended, then we should delete the snow LODs from them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've testing in other areas and the texture seams happen just about everywhere; however, they are mostly hidden by terrain or flora when playing at eye level. The only time you may notice them is look down from a high point (sight seeing). The one I found outside of Windhelm was a rare case I believe due to the position of the character and terrain combination. There is another in these shots; however this is a compare of the normals for non-snowy terrain. It would appear they only add slightly darker areas to the LODs, which is nice but is it necessary or needed?

 

Hi Res Meshes >> Hi Res Meshes+Normals

Posted Image Posted Image

 

I agree that EDT2 is the best in non-snowy terrain, however, the HQLODs do add some needed detail in distant terrain that mainly falls in the category of "terrain outlines" (you can see a small sample of this above in the snowy shots) which I think is all STEP needs. I agree with your recommendation. High Res meshes only for HQLODs.

 

@Neo,

Since you mainly tested near Whiterun you might want to reconsider those normals...at least in snowy areas.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've testing in other areas and the texture seams happen just about everywhere; however, they are mostly hidden by terrain or flora when playing at eye level. The only time you may notice them is look down from a high point (sight seeing). The one I found outside of Windhelm was a rare case I believe due to the position of the character and terrain combination. There is another in these shots; however this is a compare of the normals for non-snowy terrain. It would appear they only add slightly darker areas to the LODs, which is nice but is it necessary or needed?

 

Hi Res Meshes >> Hi Res Meshes+Normals

Posted Image Posted Image

 

I agree that EDT2 is the best in non-snowy terrain, however, the HQLODs do add some needed detail in distant terrain that mainly falls in the category of "terrain outlines" (you can see a small sample of this above in the snowy shots) which I think is all STEP needs. I agree with your recommendation. High Res meshes only for HQLODs.

 

@Neo,

Since you mainly tested near Whiterun you might want to reconsider those normals...at least in snowy areas.

I still don't understand what is in the screens above ... do both of these have EDT2 or not?

 

I think the second image is best, so those normals do add something in non snowy terrain.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

All the screens are will a full STEP:Extended install. Hi-Res Meshes are with the meshes only. Meshes+Normals are the the meshes and the normals for the HQLODs. EDT2 is present in all screens because the only thing being tested here is the HQLODs.

 

I think the best recommendation would be EDT2 + HQLODs + HQLOD Normals (but deleting the snowy terrain normals.). This can easily be done with a FOMOD for MO users if there happen to be a lot of snowy normals...or a batch file.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Correct. Their "okay" in the snowy terrain; however, in the tundra they become completely noticeable due to the color difference. Think blonde to brown contrast. Not something you want in your game.

 

The Hi-Res Meshes and the normals will be the recommendation. First we have to find the snowy normals so they can be recommended to be deleted from the mod to resolve the bright snow effect.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Soo... tracking down these snow normals is going to be one hell of a chore (1344 files sift through). At this point I honestly don't even know what I'm looking for. Most of the associated textures look like "map view" textures. Then there are just textures with noise in them (which I've found out that DDSopt reduces them to a single pixel file with optimizing...don't know if this effect is desirable or not). Any help in pinpointing or how to pinpoint these normals that are making the snow brighter would be appreciated!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Guidelines, Privacy Policy, and Terms of Use.