phazer11 Posted September 30, 2013 Share Posted September 30, 2013 I think they were trying to be facetious. Link to comment
z929669 Posted October 13, 2013 Author Share Posted October 13, 2013 Updated OP with link to Pack support thread to address any user issues. Link to comment
z929669 Posted October 23, 2013 Author Share Posted October 23, 2013 Pack interface has been significantly updated in terms of the buggy popup and the aesthetic presentation. Much more to do, but it should be significantly easier to get the job done now. Link to comment
z929669 Posted October 30, 2013 Author Share Posted October 30, 2013 Quick ping to Pack Users. What are your main improvement requests now that we have added some features? We are still a long way off, but before we begin making any changes, it would be good to get any user feedback that has not yet been captured. I'll update the OP with a link to a changelog when I have some time. Link to comment
Smile44 Posted October 30, 2013 Share Posted October 30, 2013 I have another pack in the works, so assuming the things that were problems before are now fixed I can give feedback on the current format as I build the new pack. It does look a good deal better now than it did. :) Link to comment
EssArrBee Posted November 7, 2013 Share Posted November 7, 2013 I'm trying to use the pack form on the wiki and I can't edit the page after I put in the name for all the pack info. Link to comment
Nearox Posted November 7, 2013 Share Posted November 7, 2013 @menmaatra & mothergoose: This isn't the right thread (at all) for that... @EssArrBee, what do you mean exactly? What pack info? ::EDIT by RootsRat:: I split the non-relevant posts to a new thread and moved it to Support forums. Link to comment
EssArrBee Posted November 7, 2013 Share Posted November 7, 2013 I don't have permission to build packs, so I can't edit the form to put up the wiki page for a pack. Link to comment
CJ2311 Posted February 9, 2014 Share Posted February 9, 2014 *Pokes staff* I'd like to get authoring permissions to start working on 2 packs, one for city overhauls, and another for quest mods. Pretty please? The topic simply says to come forward, so I'm not sure who I should contact for this. Link to comment
torminater Posted February 10, 2014 Share Posted February 10, 2014 I guess z would need to do this... Link to comment
PlanetExp Posted February 10, 2014 Share Posted February 10, 2014 *Pokes staff*I'd like to get authoring permissions to start working on 2 packs, one for city overhauls, and another for quest mods. Pretty please?The topic simply says to come forward, so I'm not sure who I should contact for this.Can't you just use a thread or a text document? When it's ironed out make a wiki out of it. Or this: https://wiki.step-project.com/Form:Pack Link to comment
CJ2311 Posted February 10, 2014 Share Posted February 10, 2014 I guess z would need to do this...Yeah, I already got it sorted out with Z via PM, thanks :) Can't you just use a thread or a text document? When it's ironed out make a wiki out of it. Or this: https://wiki.step-project.com/Form:PackThe thread is already there, and the pack form does not work if you've not got the permissions. :p Link to comment
Spock Posted February 11, 2014 Share Posted February 11, 2014 A general question about good practice in packs. Regarding a Requiem pack you have to uninstall certain incompatible or redundant mods from core (or other packs if you want to make it compatible). What do you think would be the best practice of providing that information? Link to comment
EssArrBee Posted February 11, 2014 Share Posted February 11, 2014 A general question about good practice in packs. Regarding a Requiem pack you have to uninstall certain incompatible or redundant mods from core (or other packs if you want to make it compatible). What do you think would be the best practice of providing that information? Lead with that and do instructions for their removal before the pack itself. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Link to comment
z929669 Posted February 11, 2014 Author Share Posted February 11, 2014 A general question about good practice in packs. Regarding a Requiem pack you have to uninstall certain incompatible or redundant mods from core (or other packs if you want to make it compatible). What do you think would be the best practice of providing that information?Assume MO users (and recommend MO in your Pack just as STEP does. Then it is a simple matter of unticking the mod in question ;) One more reason why we recommend MO now Link to comment
Recommended Posts