Jump to content

The best game in Fallout series?


Which ons of Fallout games is the best?  

31 members have voted

  1. 1. Which ons of Fallout games is the best?

    • Fallout 1
      2
    • Fallout 2
      8
    • Fallout Tactics: Brotherhood of Steel
      0
    • Fallout 3 (+DLC)
      8
    • Fallout: New Vegas (+DLC)
      18
    • I've never played Fallout games
      4


Recommended Posts

  • 3 weeks later...
  • 1 month later...

I'm going to say New Vegas.

 

I do like the idea of playing all the factions off against each other, I like the setting a tad more than Fallout 3 as well.

 

Having said that I wouldn't complain if all I ever got to play was Fallout 3.

 

I have Fallout 2 hiding somewhere but never played it to comment.

Edited by Nozzer66
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Interesting question. 

 

I don't think comparing 1 & 2 with 3 and NV is really a fair comparison. They're very different games and each excellent in they're own way. 

 

Choosing between one and two is tough. FO2 was the first of the series I encountered, and I have great nostalgia for the game. Looking back though, I think some of the elements felt a little forced in comparison to Fallout. It's a slight thing, but if I had to choose, I'd choose FO1.

 

For 3 and NV, I'd go for FO3 every time. I prefer the music, the setting, the characters, pretty much everything really.  Which I find odd in some ways: Obsidian has a lot of the original Fallout series devs I believe and in a great many ways NV is a better Fallout than FO3 ever was. The deathclaws and radscorpions are again the terrors I remember from the original games; the setting is more akin to that of the originals, the super mutants more nuanced rather than the stereotypical thugs of the Capital Wasteland. So why don't I enjoy it the most?

 

I've talked to some hardcore Fallout fans who assume that Bethesda didn't entirely understand the cannon, and basically got it wrong. I tend to think that where they compromised on Fallout lore, they did it based on experience of what worked well and what didn't in a Gamebryo based environment. I think NV is a better Fallout, but I think FO3 is a better game.  Certainly it's the one I enjoy the most.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 year later...

I never actually got to play Fallout 1 & 2, I started on Fallout 3 and I played it to completion on Xbox 360 and liked it that much I bought it again on PC and now thanks to the wonders of Fallout 4 I also have a digital copy of 3 on my xbox one, between 3 and NV I would choose 3 everytime, the story feels better now that the Broken Steel dlc changed the ending slightly, I never even got halfway through with NV before I stopped playing, I did try to get back into it recently but just finished the goodsprings missions and was already fed up so went back to 3.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've played Fallout 1-3, partial FO4, and FNV. Fallout 2 is my personal favorite since it seems more like a real RPG with lots of choices, and because I really like the whimsical atmosphere. Of the Bethesda Fallout games it's hard for me to choose between Fallout 3 and Fallout NV as each have some advantages and disadvantages. I can say that I prefer Fallout 3 and Fallout NV to what I've seen so far in Fallout 4; it's seems more like a first person shooter with some quests than an RPG. It's added some nice features (settlements, a uniform approach to weapon and armor mods), but it seems to have strayed from what I expect in an RPG.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 year later...
  • 2 weeks later...

Fallout 2 is my personal #1. Main reason why: I'm old!

 

Now seriously: main reason: funniest NPCs and best-quality dialogues of all Fallout games thus far! Typhon, Renesco "the Rocketman" or the chess-playing radscorpion were all great and hilarious, to name a few. All NPC had individuallity and effort put into them. The pop-culture references were also great. The game never took itself too seriously, which I find is a minor flaw of FO 3 and a MAJOR flaw of FO4.

 

Also FO2 had a distinct RPG-feel and was primarily a game about choices: it was impossible to max out every single stat and/or skill, so plaaning ahead and careful perk picking were important.

 

Battles were also very tactical and did not rely on reflexes, which suits me better, as I am not that good at reflex-heavy games (like FPSs).

 

That being said, I relly enjoyed FO1, FO3 and espcially FO:NV, which I view as the spiritual successor of Interplay's Fallout series. I haven't played BoS and I don't plan to play FO4 in the near future, as I don't like the direction it has taken.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Guidelines, Privacy Policy, and Terms of Use.