Jump to content


Photo

Help Improve Pack Creation!

pack

  • Please log in to reply
105 replies to this topic

#76 TechAngel85

TechAngel85

    Akatosh

  • Administrator
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 12,790 posts

Posted 27 August 2014 - 08:19 AM

Just had a look at it... Nah. There is plenty of space (on my 1080p screen) for it to be horizontal. Also I would have it read Forum Thread or Support Thread just so that it sticks out a bit more.

By the way can you use spoiler tages or something else so that the user has to click on it and then it opens a box with text? It doesn't seem to work for me at the wiki. 

 

Much like you can on forums:

 

 

For instance, instead of the seperate REGS - SRLE compatibility section, I want to include these instructions at the REGS page but only if they are initially hidden and can be viewed by users when they click a box or something like a spoiler tag. If spoiler tage is the way to go, is it possible to change the titel from 'spoiler' to 'instructions for SRLE users'. 

https://wiki.step-pr...estCollapseMenu



#77 Nearox

Nearox

    Jarl

  • VIP-Supporter
  • PipPipPip
  • 1,393 posts

Posted 27 August 2014 - 09:20 AM

Ooh so that is what you meant with collapse functionality earlier in the thread. Thanks :)


Edited by Nearox, 27 August 2014 - 09:21 AM.

  • 0

#78 hishutup

hishutup

    Daedric Prince

  • VIP-Supporter
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,680 posts

Posted 27 August 2014 - 09:56 AM

Yup, collapsible menus are amazing but I noticed sometime after editing and then after reloading the collapse/expand button disappears and they appear to be in a Expanded table. Its kinda annoying.


  • 0

#79 EssArrBee

EssArrBee

    Incompatibilism Manager

  • VIP-Supporter
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 7,461 posts

Posted 27 August 2014 - 09:57 AM

Yup, collapsible menus are amazing but I noticed sometime after editing and then after reloading the collapse/expand button disappears and they appear to be in a Expanded table. Its kinda annoying.

THis needs to be reported to s4n. Maybe put it as an issue in the wiki sub forum and take a screen or two if you can.


  • 0

#80 hishutup

hishutup

    Daedric Prince

  • VIP-Supporter
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,680 posts

Posted 27 August 2014 - 10:04 AM

Ok, I will next time I go to write it.


  • 0

#81 z929669

z929669

    Ixian Inventor

  • Administrator
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 6,826 posts

Posted 27 August 2014 - 11:31 AM

Hiding text is not ideal either. If a TOC is too wide, then it's not a good candidate as a floating TOC. Let's not go altering things in the Wiki that is not consistent. This is one example of why I don't like the CSS extension.

I see you created a TOC limit template, but how do you intend it to work (see talk page)



#82 EssArrBee

EssArrBee

    Incompatibilism Manager

  • VIP-Supporter
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 7,461 posts

Posted 27 August 2014 - 12:00 PM

I see you created a TOC limit template, but how do you intend it to work (see talk page)

I left you a message, also just search wikipedia for help TOC I believe. It is implemented the same way.


  • 0

#83 z929669

z929669

    Ixian Inventor

  • Administrator
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 6,826 posts

Posted 27 August 2014 - 12:18 PM

I left you a message, also just search wikipedia for help TOC I believe. It is implemented the same way.

Hmmm, I still don't get it ... If you understand it, could you update the Template page as I describe here? I am trying to implement on Neo's old guide, but no luck.

 

I left another comment on the talk page.



#84 EssArrBee

EssArrBee

    Incompatibilism Manager

  • VIP-Supporter
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 7,461 posts

Posted 27 August 2014 - 12:46 PM

I added some info to the template page.

 

The reason it didn't work on the old SR page is that you only use {{TOC limit}} but there is no limit in the template. It has so look like {{TOC limit|#}}.

 

Also, since {{TOC right}} is already there you should combine them {{TOC right|limit=#}}.


  • 0

#85 z929669

z929669

    Ixian Inventor

  • Administrator
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 6,826 posts

Posted 27 August 2014 - 02:32 PM

Thanks ... I also found that if TOC right/left is present in any way, TOC limit has no effect (even if correctly parameterized), so that was my problem.



#86 stoppingby4now

stoppingby4now

    Sleepy

  • Founder
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,419 posts

Posted 27 August 2014 - 03:58 PM

Oh yeah also, is it possible for the ToC to include numbers in both the ToC and in the headings that are on the page? I think back when we made REGS we weren't able to do it, and only have numbers in the ToC. 

The TOC can be auto-numbered, but headings are not. The latter is a user preference available under the top menu.

 

<user>->preferences->appearance

 

Under Advanced Options, tick the Auto-number headings checkbox.


  • 0

#87 Nearox

Nearox

    Jarl

  • VIP-Supporter
  • PipPipPip
  • 1,393 posts

Posted 30 August 2014 - 04:29 PM

Ahh I see, thx.

 

Also SRB the horizontal 'forum thread' link is looking nice. I am thinking though, now that that info block has become relatively small. Why not center it at the pack page? That way it'll jump out more. Maybe just try it and see if you/we like it. 


Edited by Nearox, 30 August 2014 - 04:30 PM.

  • 0

#88 DoubleYou

DoubleYou

    Wiki Stepper

  • Uber Moderator
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 4,770 posts

Posted 31 August 2014 - 04:58 PM

Made some changes today to Pack template. Just one minor compatibility issue, which actually was due to a bug in the code.

  • Forum Thread link is now toward the center (right) rather than in front of the Pack info. It also has been shrunk to the same size of the "CURRENT VERSION" and "REQUIRED DLC" text. Might want to increase the size and/or change font?
  • Required DLC now appear in the main Pack header to the right and use the symbols used in the STEP Guide.
  • Short description now correctly parses lines and doesn't force them all into one paragraph. (bug fix)

Because of the last change, Pack:Requiem's short description now has multiple paragraphs, as that is how it was entered, which is why I say there is a minor compatibility issue. Easy fix would be to remove the extra lines between phrases, or actually make the short description shorter...



#89 DoubleYou

DoubleYou

    Wiki Stepper

  • Uber Moderator
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 4,770 posts

Posted 31 August 2014 - 05:15 PM

Okay, changed the Forum Thread link to be bigger, as it just seemed too small.



#90 TechAngel85

TechAngel85

    Akatosh

  • Administrator
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 12,790 posts

Posted 31 August 2014 - 05:24 PM

Looks good!





Also tagged with one or more of these keywords: pack

0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users