Jump to content


Photo
accepted

DRAGON PRIEST (by Kajuan)

skyrim

  • Please log in to reply
43 replies to this topic

#1 oqhansoloqo

oqhansoloqo

    High King

  • Staff
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,398 posts

Posted 01 July 2015 - 05:29 PM

Discussion thread:
DRAGON PRIEST by Kajuan
Wiki Link
 


 
 
Looks like a nice retexturing of the dragon priests.  The author definitely did a lot more to improve upon the textures than just trying to run some filters on them.
  • 0

#2 Octopuss

Octopuss

    Swears by everything

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,627 posts

Posted 02 July 2015 - 02:19 AM

Looks interesting, but it takes a lot of detail away from the vanilla texture.

It's still better than the priest from Book of Silence though.


  • 0

#3 Nebulous112

Nebulous112

    High King

  • Super Moderators
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,451 posts

Posted 11 November 2015 - 01:36 PM

Since everyone seems to be going Kajuan-crazy for the new release (with good reason!), anyone have any thoughts on this one?

#4 TechAngel85

TechAngel85

    Akatosh

  • Administrators
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 12,626 posts

Posted 11 November 2015 - 09:37 PM

I haven't been able to test it yet. Might be able to get to it in the morning.



#5 Greg

Greg

    Dragon Prince

  • Super Moderators
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,038 posts

Posted 01 January 2016 - 06:33 PM

Hevnoraak vanilla, aMidianBorn Book of Silence, and Dragon Priest.

PhAoQW3fHXA4aKzij6XwMJViXf2X3xyp1Cm0Zaq4xoI8OZmL

Krosis vanilla, aMidianBorn Book of Silence, and Dragon Priest.

BEBOe6tq2qt6St6MPnS9QjepB6MUZ1bQnkFuYCJjbK2fTpU2

Morokei vanilla, aMidianBorn Book of Silence, and Dragon Priest.

JyaT2OmOquQUJxk2NrWrSuxSh2WZib6ZeYkHSkLKCXmEUbKs

Nahkriin vanilla, aMidianBorn Book of Silence, and Dragon Priest.

B969phOqyNVdvZxzbP00LmxYONNrTO8SnsKzdxilmpkmVqkN
 
EDIT: How do you keep these turkeys from flying around to get decent compares?



#6 phazer11

phazer11

    Chatroom Supervisor

  • Super Moderators
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,288 posts

Posted 01 January 2016 - 11:54 PM

You go into console and type tm



#7 TechAngel85

TechAngel85

    Akatosh

  • Administrators
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 12,626 posts

Posted 02 January 2016 - 09:50 AM

Unfortunately there is no mixing and matching with this one. It's either one or the other. The problem is that I can't find any reference as to the armor they wear and what material it's suppose to be. For this reason, I'd like to see a vanilla shot for comparison. The one that matches vanilla the best, will probably be my choice.



#8 Greg

Greg

    Dragon Prince

  • Super Moderators
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,038 posts

Posted 02 January 2016 - 11:40 AM

I updated the post with a screenshot of vanilla Krosis and it looks as if Dragon Priest is very close to Vanilla. The hands are obviously different whereas the remainder seems to have subtle differences.

 

I think the positioning of vanilla Krosis is off too much making a direct compare difficult, so I'll go back in game to get some more screenshots using tm (thanks Phazer) to hopefully keep them in the same position.



#9 Sixxness

Sixxness

    Citizen

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 95 posts

Posted 02 January 2016 - 06:49 PM

"Dragon Priest" looks better imo, and matches the vanilla style more.


  • 0

#10 Shadriss

Shadriss

    High King

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,496 posts

Posted 03 January 2016 - 12:37 AM

It does, Sixx... but I also note at least one that has a significant variation on the arms, creating a colored banding pattern that I find distracting. Were it not for that...


  • 0

#11 Greg

Greg

    Dragon Prince

  • Super Moderators
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,038 posts

Posted 03 January 2016 - 09:51 AM

Do you remember which resolution of the mod you were using that had this banding effect? I'm currently using the 2k version and I haven't noticed this yet.



#12 TechAngel85

TechAngel85

    Akatosh

  • Administrators
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 12,626 posts

Posted 03 January 2016 - 10:00 AM

From the shots alone, I'm inclined to go with this mod over AMB. It's a lot closer to vanilla and looks better. The darker tone of AMB often loses details.

 

@Greg and all,

When doing compares for STEP, don't forget to turn your ENB off. :thumbsup: (Shift+F12)



#13 Shadriss

Shadriss

    High King

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,496 posts

Posted 03 January 2016 - 03:29 PM

Do you remember which resolution of the mod you were using that had this banding effect? I'm currently using the 2k version and I haven't noticed this yet.

Just looking at your shot of Morokai in particular. Look at the arm armor, and you'll see the colored banding I'm referring to.


  • 0

#14 Nebulous112

Nebulous112

    High King

  • Super Moderators
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,451 posts

Posted 03 January 2016 - 03:33 PM

I noticed that banding in the screenshots as well. Is this effect in the screenshots due to the ENB being left on, as Tech alluded to? Or is that banding inherent in the new textures themselves?

#15 phazer11

phazer11

    Chatroom Supervisor

  • Super Moderators
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,288 posts

Posted 03 January 2016 - 07:33 PM

Now I know we did compares of the other aMB option for the dragon priests (concept edition I think it was in the installer) but it might be a good idea to throw it into the mix as well.





Also tagged with one or more of these keywords: accepted, skyrim

0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users