Jump to content


Photo

ENB Comparisons (Performance) for STEP Extended

enb performance comparison

  • Please log in to reply
No replies to this topic

#1 Pandore

Pandore

    Citizen

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 56 posts

Posted 26 January 2016 - 09:40 AM

Hello everybody !
 
My rig is not really powerfull, but I absolutely want an ENB to run, smoothly as it could, with my game. 
So I felt the need to test the "Performance", as it states, ENBs to compare for my visual taste and for the performance impact. 
 
And I felt I can share that for the one interested !
 
I have the STEP extended install, and other mods, the main changes for landscapes is Verdant Grass mod, I think.
 
For the ini changes, I put my iMinGrassSize to 80, and I removed all the deferred shadows (DrawLandShadows, Shadow on grass, etc). I changed the resolution of Shadows to 1024.
 
For the moment, ENBs that are tested :
 
My rig is not really powerfull, but I absolutely wanted an ENB to run, smoothly as it could, with my game. 
So I felt the need to compare ENBs about visuals and performance hit.
 
And I felt I can share it ! Here it is : https://www.flickr.c...157661639983923
 
I have the STEP extended install (https://wiki.step-pr...om/STEP:2.2.9.2), and other mods, the main other mods I use for landscapes is Verdant Grass mod (https://www.nexusmods.com/skyrim/mods/60220/?), I think.
 
For the ini changes, I put my iMinGrassSize to 80, and I removed all the deferred shadows (DrawLandShadows, Shadow on grass, etc). I changed the resolution of my Shadows to 1024 also.
 
More comparisons will normally come. If you have an interesting ENB to test, tell me in the comments !

 

At the moment, ENBs that are tested :
Redshift performance ENB, https://www.nexusmod...im/mods/55134/?
Vividian ENB, Vanilla Preset, performance version :  https://www.nexusmod...im/mods/36067/?

Edited by Pandore, 26 January 2016 - 09:41 AM.

  • 0



Also tagged with one or more of these keywords: enb, performance, comparison

0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users